I remember the first time I learned about child labor when I was a kid. The pictures were terrifying. They weren’t just scary; they were devastating. You saw these children in factories, covered in dirt, huddled together working, their faces masked in dust. There was something so incredibly sad about it. My God, they stood around pretending to be adults, but you could tell by their eyes that they didn’t have the conviction of adulthood. Seeing children in that state is a gut-punch, especially when you compare it to the opposite imagery of childhood: kids running in a park, laughter, bright colors, and pure joy.
It’s a stark, painful contrast.
I remember feeling this massive sense of relief that child labor was abolished. That children didn’t have to perform labor anymore. Now, obviously, we know it still occurs in several countries around the world, and that is still an ongoing battle. However, in this article, I want us to focus on child labor through a completely different lens. One we rarely, if ever, speak about: the fact that children are still working.
They are working more than ever, right now, in the very same countries that once loudly declared they abolished child labor.
If you go on Google today and search for “child labor,” you immediately see those same black-and-white photos of dirty children in historical factories, or modern images of kids in trash sites and agricultural fields. The official definition reflects this. According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), child labor is defined as:
“...work that deprives children of their childhood, their potential and their dignity, and that is harmful to physical and mental development.”
But what is so interesting is the paragraph the ILO uses to accompany this definition. They write, word-for-word:
“Not all work done by children should be classified as child labour that is to be targeted for elimination. The participation of children or adolescents above the minimum age for admission to employment in work that does not affect their health and personal development or interfere with their schooling, is generally regarded as being something positive. This includes activities such as assisting in a family business or earning pocket money outside school hours and during school holidays. These kinds of activities contribute to children’s development and to the welfare of their families; they provide them with skills and experience, and help to prepare them to be productive members of society during their adult life.”
The ILO begins that paragraph by stating that “not all work done by children should be classified as child labor.”
And that right there is the root of this entire article.
By declaring that “not all work” is child labor, and by framing the concept through a single, narrow narrative (dirty children in factories or starving children in landfills) we completely overlook the labor being performed by children with clean skin and cute clothes on the internet. Because we’ve decided that if a child is functional, and if they look okay on the surface, their actual physical and mental labor doesn’t count.
We’re going to be talking about two very specific types of unacknowledged labor here: the labor a child performs in the home, and the labor that is now incredibly prevalent in our society—children working as online influencers.
Because these do not fit into the “worst forms of child labor” as defined by international standards, we dismiss them. We overlook them. Why? Because, as the International Labor Organization says, this kind of work is “generally regarded as being something positive.” They go so far as to claim that assisting in a family business “contributes to the child’s development and to the welfare of the family.”
Cue that phrase: the welfare of the family.
But is the welfare of the family being put above the welfare of the child?
The ILO argues that this labor provides children with the skills and experience needed to become productive members of society. Unfortunately, this line of thinking excuses the system. It permits children to perform labor under the guise of character-building. But here is the truth: irrespective of whether a child is laughing and having an amazing time, a job is a job.
When we decide that only one specific, physical form of employment is harmful, we stop looking at what “unconventional” jobs are doing to a child’s mental and emotional development.
Because the official definition only captures hazardous, extreme conditions, where does that leave everything else? Who is checking in on the hours and conditions of a child working inside the family home? What regulatory bodies are in place to protect them, the way we regulate a standard corporation?
When you strip a family of its sentimentality, a family can operate exactly like a business. And often, the child is working for that business. Just because a child in a developed country isn’t working in an agricultural field doesn’t mean their work isn’t harmful. It harms how they learn about systems. It shapes the narratives they accept about the world. It conditions their young minds to accept unfairness, deep inequality, and massive power imbalances—all orchestrated by their own parents.
But because of how we’ve defined “labor,” we refuse to acknowledge it.
The best example of this blind spot is our cultural fascination with child beauty pageants. Think about Toddlers & Tiaras, which was one of the most influential reality television shows of its time.
Those kids were working.
But because they didn’t have coal on their faces, because they weren’t covered in dust, because they weren’t skinny, starving, or carrying trash bags, we excused it. We excused it because the physical conditions of the child looked appealing to the masses.
Society only credits what it can see on the body.
We look at the physical container, while the mind and the emotions are completely ignored. If a child is clean, looks healthy, is a good weight, and is dressed up nicely, no one wants to admit they are performing a job. The ugly truth is that children are being exploited for labor today. This is a conversation we must have right now because of the meteoric rise and power of the creator economy.
Let’s not sugarcoat it under the guise of “cute family content” or “parents documenting their child growing up.” This is children working. The child is working. And in many cases, they are being exploited by their parents to generate household income.
Income the child may never touch or even know about.
We consider adult creators and influencers to be employed; we recognize it as their job. We must look at children the same way. Just because a parent is the one hitting “record” and uploading the video doesn’t mean the child isn’t serving as an actor. An employee.
Many children today desperately need to be protected from their own parents’ exploitation. Parents are filming their kids for YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram, turning every single private moment (from the second they wake up to the moment they go to sleep) into content for millions of strangers.
This is child labor.
In fact, these kids are working a double shift: they go to school, and then they come home to perform. They’re forced to do multiple retakes, to pose, and to smile on command. Their fundamental right to privacy is completely stripped away so their parents can make a commercial buck. Yet we pretend it isn’t labor because the child’s body is in pristine condition.
These kids aren’t growing up with parents; they are growing up with bosses. They’re used as free, cheap labor to make money online—compensated only by the misery of a new toy or a trip to McDonald’s.
And while social media is the most visible form of this modern exploitation, what about the invisible labor happening behind closed doors?
We know what happens. We know about the children scrubbing floors, cooking for their siblings, and acting as co-parents. But because it’s quiet, and because it’s in the home, we don’t ask: Is this child allowed to say no?
When a child is forced to take on the emotional and functional roles of an adult, that is labor. We mask it as “helpfulness,” pointing back to the ILO’s definition that these chores “provide them with skills... to become productive members of society.”
But let’s look at the adults who do this work. A housekeeper is paid to scrub floors and clean. A nanny is paid to take care of children when parents don’t have the time. Why are these recognized as paid professions for adults, but when a child performs these exact same duties for free, we call it “family contribution” and refuse to label it child labor?
Because it doesn’t look like a 19th-century factory, society looks the other way. We ignore the other forms of labor that are deeply damaging to a child’s mental and emotional development. These children are losing their childhoods. They are developing chronic anxiety, hyper-responsibility, and a toxic hyper-independence. They’re being conditioned to believe their only value lies in what they can perform or do for others.
But why does society let this slide?
Because these traits don’t serve the child, they serve the system. Remember, the goal of the official definition is to prepare children to be “productive members of society.”
Anxiety? Hyper-responsibility? A deep-seated belief that your value only lies in your performance and obedience? Doesn’t that sound like the absolute dream profile of an obedient corporate employee?
By refusing to acknowledge this labor, we aren’t protecting children. We’re just conditioning them to accept power imbalances, inequality, and exploitation. Preparing them to transition seamlessly from the exploitation of the home to the exploitation of the corporate world.
We are going to see the devastating mental and emotional effects of this play out in the upcoming generations. These are the kids who are growing up with their lives on display, working as digital creators before they even know what a job is.
The influencer world is particularly dangerous because it thrives entirely on the attention economy. What are we teaching a child when we condition them to endlessly chase attention? How much of their autonomy are they being forced to give up? How much of their privacy must they compromise just to keep the views up? We are teaching children the logic of social media algorithms rather than letting them experience an actual childhood.
So let’s stop pretending.
Even in the wealthiest, most “developed” countries in the world, children are working.
Child labor is very much alive, and it is entertaining your afternoons.
Almost every invisible script we live out (our relationship with success, struggle, obligations, and how these things pressure us to erase ourselves) was originally learned within the first institution we ever belonged to: the family.
If you’re ready to look at your reality honestly, grab a copy of Family Inc.
—
New here? Join the newsletter to get Chapter 4: What Will the Neighbors Say? for free delivered straight to your inbox, along with insights examining these systems.